It says "gv[IV \&main::g] s"
"gv" means a glob. "\&" means a code ref. Odd. Let's look at pp_gv.
According to a comment and an assert in pp_gv, the attached SV "might be a real GV or might be an RV to a CV". So it could be *main::g or \&main::g. Does B::Concise distinguish between these, or does it always print \&main::g?
That's as far as I got.
In reply to Re: How is redefining a sub internally done?
by ikegami
in thread How is redefining a sub internally done?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |