sounds like a way to me to guarantee by restrictions that all sites comply to textual browsability.
True, but that could be better accomplished using a restrictive web client. There's no need to reinvent a whole networking architecture to refuse non-text documents. Then, instead of an unsupported Gemini protocol, you have a network of Gemini web sites that anyone can visit. And those that want to enforce a stay within the network can do so using a web browser plugin.
In reply to Re^2: Technobabble (was: Re: Adding recognition of Gemini to URI.pm?)
by ikegami
in thread Adding recognition of Gemini to URI.pm?
by mldvx4
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |