With WSL, the packages in use are native Linux, whereas in Cygwin there is only a subset available. Installing a package from source may work, but is cumbersome. When you select a new Cygwin package for installation, the package manager will update everything. Maybe you get a new perl version and you have to reinstall all of your local perl modules.
I do not see any disadvantages in using WSL. The integration is flawless: you can run Win programs from bash and Linux programs from Win. X11 and Wayland are natively supported: no need for a separate X11/Wayland server.
Greetings,
🐻
In reply to Re^3: What's happening with the Cygwin project?
by jo37
in thread What's happening with the Cygwin project?
by Intrepid
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |