100% this. The only thing I'd throw into the mix would be not doing a complete port of every feature at once, rather ensure minimal viable product/functionality and add the bells and whistles later, if there's still an appetite. It'd be interesting to know how many active users make use of some of the less obvious features and customisation options.
In reply to Re^3: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0
by marto
in thread Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0
by jdporter
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |