Even though I am pretty good at Perl regex, I am learning Perl regex so I can understand the Perl Monks threads on the subject.
I found https://perldoc.perl.org/perlretut entitled perlretut - Perl regular expressions tutorial.
Everything was fine until I came upon this passage in https://perldoc.perl.org/perlretut#Using-character-classes.
(This is a tutorial. It probably belongs in a footnote.)
For natural language processing (so that, for example, apostrophes are + included in words), use instead \b{wb}</p> "don't" =~ / .+? \b{wb} /x; # matches the whole string
What is going on here?
Regex101 is no help.
I wrote a test to try to understand it. It only caused me more confusion.
use warnings; use strict; use feature qw{ say }; if ("don't" =~ / (.+?) (\b{wb}) /x) { # matches the whole string print "It matches\n"; say $1; say $2; } else { print "It doesn't match\n"; } if ("don't" =~ / (.+?) /x) { # It no longer matches the whole string print "It matches\n"; say $1; } else { print "It doesn't match\n"; } Output: It matches don't It matches d
Who is going to attempt natural language processing with a couple of lines of Perl regex in 2025?
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |