Greetings, PerlMonks!

I'm trying to figure out if foreach is faster than grep with map. I've replaced grep and map in a large script with foreach and noticed a substantial speed improvement, so my guess is that it is faster. However, I'd like to verify that somehow.

With the two scripts below, am I comparing the same things and not apple to oranges? Or have I misunderstood grep and map?

#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my @c = (1 .. 10000000); my @d; foreach my $dd (@c) { push(@d, $dd % 2); } my @e; foreach my $ee (@d) { if (!$ee) { push(@e, $ee); } } exit(0);

The script above is much faster than the one below, according to time.

#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my @c = (1 .. 10000000); my @d = map( $_%2, @c); my @e = grep(/0/, @d); exit(0);

In reply to Speed comparison of foreach vs grep + map by mldvx4

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.