OK, the explanation that I honestly didn't read properly was a by-product of the code generation, so to speak. The code wasn't wrong - it output the same as your one liner. Unfortunately, I then added the explanation somewhat prematurely and only explicitly named the "source" when you asked. I already said that I thought that was clear from the context. I have no intention of passing off AI-generated content as my work - that should be clear. A completely different question is whether the generated content is really one hundred percent wrong. But I think we'd better leave that alone.
Best regards, Karl
In reply to Re^11: Introspection into floats/NV
by karlgoethebier
in thread Introspection into floats/NV
by LanX
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |