Scaling better outcome isn't disputed, immediate results very much are. You missed - $n (see "overshoot" above). Perhaps you are tired I'm just irritating the hell out of people with non-issues, sorry
In reply to Re^4: Possessive sub-pattern with non-greedy content + recursion: WHY does this work??
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Possessive sub-pattern with non-greedy content + recursion: WHY does this work??
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |