I'm sticking with the old.

From what I read, the rationale for this new thing is to be an MVP of OO syntax for those familiar with other languages to port stuff easily to core Perl without having to worry about Moo, etc. While that's fine, it isn't my use case.

Probably 90% of the OO code I write is classic bless() stuff. When I need/want a bit more it's Class::Tiny for maybe 8% and on those rare occasions even more is wanted then it's Moo for that final 2%. It really doesn't feel like I'm missing out on anything by continuing with this approach.

🦛

In reply to Re: Anyone migrated to the new 'class' way of OOP? by hippo
in thread Anyone migrated to the new 'class' way of OOP? by stevieb

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.