My bad, I stand corrected. But writing A < B from the beginning would have been better.
> Namely, in Example 4,
does only give the number of occurrences not that explicit result you showed.
Without calculating the numbers for both interpretations, it's not possible to tell which one is right, if you suspect that the wording is flawed.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re^3: Faster (but uglier) PWC 350-2 solutions
by LanX
in thread Faster (but uglier) PWC 350-2 solutions
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |