"...it is still against my sense of economy or ecology"
Yes sure. But as i wrote:
"...less or more useful little hints"
IMHO it wasn't a bad idea to point the OP to $.
"...The test is pretty fast and has probably relatively limited impact of performance"
So let us compare:
#!/usr/bin/env perl use strict; use warnings; use Benchmark qw ( :hireswallclock cmpthese timethese ); our $file = qq (huge.file); our $amount = 1_000_000; sub karl { our ( $file, $amount ); open( my $in, "<", $file ); while (<$in>) { next if $. <= $amount; 1; } close $in; } sub laurent { our ( $file, $amount ); open( my $in, "<", $file ); my $useless_header_line = <$in> for 1 .. $amount; while (<$in>) { 1; } close $in; } my $results = timethese( 10, { 'karlgoethebier' => 'karl', 'Laurent_R' => 'laurent', } ); cmpthese($results); __END__ karls-mac-mini:monks karl$ perl -e 'print qq(Lorem ipsum kizuaheli\n) +for 1..50_000_000;' > huge.file karl-mac-mini:monks karl$ ls -hl huge.file -rw-r--r-- 1 karl karl 1,0G 21 Feb 17:24 huge.file karls-mac-mini:monks karl$ wc -l huge.file 50000000 huge.file karls-mac-mini:monks karl$ ./1117372.pl Benchmark: timing 10 iterations of Laurent_R, karlgoethebier... Laurent_R: 65.9521 wallclock secs (63.43 usr + 2.34 sys = 65.77 C +PU) @ 0.15/s (n=10) karlgoethebier: 127.837 wallclock secs (124.90 usr + 2.55 sys = 1 +27.45 CPU) @ 0.08/s (n=10) s/iter karlgoethebier Laurent_R karlgoethebier 12.7 -- -48% Laurent_R 6.58 94% --
"...relatively limited impact of performance"
This is relative. It is like it is ;-)
Thanks for your reply and best regards, Karl
«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»
In reply to Re^3: script assistance please
by karlgoethebier
in thread script assistance please
by perlnobie
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |