Well, fair enough. This way of "recycling" the FastqRecord object seems awkward in an otherwise OO module (at least to someone who learned Perl first and only later delved into C/C++). I do see your point, however - sticking as close as possible to the C++ API probably has the least potential for confusion and will be easiest to maintain.
Avoid XS as much as possible, unless you want to learn a lot about XS instead of just getting on with whatever task you have to completeThat is advice that I have no problem embracing.
In reply to Re^2: "Perlifying" an XSpp method
by jdv
in thread "Perlifying" an XSpp method
by jdv
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |