Thanks for your reply but i'm not convinced...
"IO::All is certainly nice for oneliners or throw-away scripts..."
Yes, but i have some scripts > 100 lines using IO::All that work for years without any quirks.
"...horribly easy to open up security holes ... open functionality transparently opens http:// URLs just like files."
May be. But if you know about this issue there is no reason to make it so.
And as fare as i remember you need IO::All::LWP installed for this kind of transparency.
"...far too much magic for my taste to make its fancy syntax work..."
Some folks like Perl for the magic.
OK, i found one feature that didn't work as proposed: Strange IO::All constructor behavior?
But remember this German saying:
"A matter of taste" said the ape and bit into the soap.
Best regards, Karl
«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»
In reply to Re^2: Why not recommend IO::All?
by karlgoethebier
in thread Why not recommend IO::All?
by karlgoethebier
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |