No, the split function is not a good way to do this trick. A regular expression is a better bet:
FWIW, split function , same as match operator, both take a regular expression ;)
In reply to Re^2: More efficient way for this pattern match?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread More efficient way for this pattern match?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |