I think the nomenclature isn't so bad.
Well yeah! But I've been worrying away at this on and off for the best part of a week.
You'd have to look back at what I started with and see the number of times I've vacillated and changed the names I currently have to appreciate the thought that's gone into what I have now. (And I just changed some of them again :)
In reply to Re^9: Naming ordinals in the presence of 3D rotation? (A better explanation of the problem?))
by BrowserUk
in thread Naming ordinals (directions/sides/faces) in the presence of 3D rotation?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |