Definitely. My goal with automation in a case like this would be to save as much typing as possible, but I'd still expect to have to test and review the edits manually. Also, I'd keep my regex fairly tight, even if that means it misses some due to unexpected formatting differences. Better to miss a few and have to edit those manually than to have it start replacing things I don't expect.
Aaron B.
Available for small or large Perl jobs and *nix system administration; see my home node.
In reply to Re^5: hash dereferencing issue with perl 5.16.3
by aaron_baugher
in thread hash dereferencing issue with perl 5.16.3
by KANAKADANDI
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |