Thank You for the reply and the thought you put into it.
I'm taking your suggestions re slurping and the hash variant under serious consideration (and not responding directly to those, right now, because first I have to be sure I didn't miss something; that I understand your intent; and that I know how and where to implement them).
As to your point re specifying the v. in use5.018, I understand but choose to post with info for the reader on just what I used to run the script. While a downward revision might be 'kind' (as in "changing it so as to save another Monk the trouble of doing so") but might sometimes leave that individual without the info re what v. I used and would always incure extra work for me.
Update: fixed in para 2: s/reading/reader/
In reply to Re^2: File Similarity Concept
by ww
in thread File Similarity Concept
by ww
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |