Sounds like a recipe for failure. How do you think Joe Programmer will check the exact amount of *bytes* to the real data? Think UTF-8 and JPEG.
As an alternative, one could think of a start-of-data-tag.
Both however will only make life for DBD::CSV harder, as it has to put the same data back on the same place on updates. I'm still not convinced this would all be worth the trouble.
In reply to Re^4: DBD::CSV Update
by Tux
in thread DBD::CSV Update
by PERL_fresher
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |