"you could own PerlMonks, you know, and probably Tim Vroom, for defamation of character and public slander."
A professional told you this? beware, people calling themselves professionals often dish out terrible advice time and time again. Often regardless of repeat correction. Sound like anyone you know? I can link to many examples if required.
"PerlMonks.org has a reputation for being a hostile place. This is not a good reflection on the Perl language, nor the Perl professional community, nor this site. It stands against everything that this site was long-ago created to do. It is also an extremely negative reference for anyone who indulges in it, whether or not they hide behind the frock of Anonymous Monk. It has no place here, nor anywhere."
Would you like me to post examples of your posts which exhibit these complaints?
"We all want PerlMonks to be “the go-to site for Perl questions on the Internet.” We therefore also want anyone to feel welcome to post their question, without even considering any risk of public humiliation, let alone castigation."
People call you out on the technical content of your posts, often the same things time and time again and you ignore them. Would you like me to post examples of this? How does this contribute to your goal quoted here?
"All of you are entirely out-of-line, and I should not have to say that."
Followed by:
"If you don’t like someone, don’t like what s/he posts, then there is a very simple and courteous solution: ignore that person."
Seems like you're not taking your own advice, again. Another do as I say, not as I do post.
In reply to Re^2: Can I please have multiple downvotes per (certain monk's) posts.
by marto
in thread Can I please have multiple downvotes per (certain monk's) posts.
by BrowserUk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |