I forget who said "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds", and it may well apply here. But it should be fairly easy to fix (I'm guessing).

When you're reading a root node and its replies (in the sections that admit discussions) there's usually a link somewhere on the page return you to the section the node is in. But the various sections are inconsistent in whether they have a link and where they place it. Here's what I've noticed in some of the sections:

I looked, but I don't think there's a User setting that will change this. (It might be particularly well hidden.)

Actually, what I think would be really slick would be links to take you to the next and previous root node in the respective section. But that would be a lot more work, no?


In reply to Inconsistency of navigation links by VSarkiss

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.