But why is # 'bash' rather than 'hash'? I'd be inclined to call either # or % 'hash'.
You nearly answered your own question. 'hash' seemed a bit ambiguous.
- tye
In reply to Re^2: Almost 28 new names for 32 old marks (hash)
by tye
in thread Almost 28 new names for 32 old marks
by tye
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |