thanks for he help!, it's an enormous thing to see the data structure by using dump
yes, the contact was a means to learn a new trick(althought, all in perl right now is a new trick to me) I got that " " made the trick work where I didn't do that. although, I am wondering with a question,
what is the difference between these:as far as data goes.any forseeable issues
colunm 3 will have the "$1num $num2" $hash{$ita}= "$num1 $num2";
vs col3 has $num1if (defined $num1){$hash{$ita}3=$num1} and
column4 has now $num2
if (defined $num2){$hash{$ita}4=$num2}
yes, I think concat is not what I want now that I know this and I have changed the code myself now too
true, the comma is cosmetic and I was looking for an exercise in manipulating printing to learn a new technique. I am sure I will get A LOT more practice on print the way I want stuff all summer
In reply to Re^4: concatenation 2 values then pushing to a hash_ref
by perlynewby
in thread concatenation 2 values then pushing to a hash_ref
by perlynewby
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |