Your post *may* have been helpful for myself and future readers of this thread if you explained *why* not to do it, and or examples of code how to get around it, which is what my question was in the first place.
In reply to Re^2: Creating sub from string without munging the symbol table
by stevieb
in thread Creating sub from string without munging the symbol table
by stevieb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |