I agree that many CPAN modules lack sufficient documentation. ... You get what you pay for. CPAN is free,
Thanks for your response. I may come back to your points once we get a few more, but at this stage I just want to make clear, the OP isn't a complaint about the documentation of any of the existing modules on CPAN. Those I mentioned or any others.
It is about trying to come up with ideas for what authors of new complex modules -- or those contributing new or amended documentation for existing ones -- can do to improve the situation.
It's not enough to just provide lots of documentation -- if it was, we wouldn't be mentioning PDL which has tons.
So, the purpose of the OP is not to complain about existing modules, but rather to brainstorm about how new modules can avoid their mistakes.
In reply to Re^2: The problem of documenting complex modules.
by BrowserUk
in thread The problem of documenting complex modules.
by BrowserUk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |