Would be cool if CPAN didn't accept dists without comprehensive docs and tests. Or at least, if there were a "top tier" of dists that meet such a criterion. Or that a dist could be relegated to a "second tier" by being downvoted ... not removed, but somehow flagged.
You can always look at the bugtracker, but if a module has no docs and no tests, why should I spend my time writing a bug report? I'd be happy to downvote it, though ...
In reply to Re^2: How to find a module to contribute to
by 1nickt
in thread How to find a module to contribute to
by stevieb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |