Filehandles are global, irrespective of the scope in which they are referenced. To say the filehandle closes when the reference count reaches zero is incorrect.
oh well, I can't retract what I know to be true!
No, because that would involve learning something?
use strict; use warnings; if (1) { local *FH; my $fh = \*FH; open $fh, 'ls /usr |'; } $_ = <FH>; warn $_; __END__ ls: write error readline() on unopened filehandle FH at - line 10. Use of uninitialized value $_ in warn at - line 12. Warning: something's wrong at - line 12.
Or, simpler demonstration:
use strict; use warnings; { open my $fh, 'ls /usr |'; } warn "End\n"; __END__ ls: write error End
Note how bin/ls complains before the script exits because my $fh is closed when the scope is left, before warn is called.
- tye
In reply to Re^3: Scoping question - will file handle be closed? ("global")
by tye
in thread Scoping question - will file handle be closed?
by Monk::Thomas
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |