I would much rather depend on Tie::IxHash than having to prepend my keys with numbers to preserve order. This could lead to a less than desirable maintenance issue down the road.
use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dumper; use Tie::IxHash; tie(my %To_Send, 'Tie::IxHash', LI_VN_Mode => '00100011', # 8 bit Stratum => '0', # 8 bit Poll => '0', # 8 bit Precision => '0', # 8 bit Root_Delay => '0', # 32 bit Dispersion => '0', # 32 bit Reference_Identifier => '0', # 32 bit Reference_Timestamp_Sec => '0', # 32 bit Reference_Timestamp_Micro_Sec => '0', # 32 bit Originate_Timestamp_Sec => '0', # 32 bit Originate_Timestamp_Micro_Sec => '0', # 32 bit Receive_Timestamp_Sec => '0', # 32 bit Receive_Timestamp_Micro_Sec => '0', # 32 bit Transmit_Timestamp_Sec => '0', # 32 bit Transmit_Timestamp_Micro_Sec => '0', # 32 bit ); print Dumper \%To_Send;
UPDATE: I never said anything about scalability. I stated my preferences. You can labor away at such code all you want to. How you derive "decrease dependencies" from "reduce defined scalars" makes zero sense as well.
jeffa
L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
In reply to Re^2: How to extract the values of an Array of Hashes
by jeffa
in thread [SOLVED] How to extract the values of an Array of Hashes
by thanos1983
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |