That sort construction is (IMO) far more obscure and obfuscate than the ternary.
As for List::Util::max(); if I need to find the max() of a bunch (more than two) things, I use it, but -- just as my wife doesn't break out her food processor to slice a tomato for a sandwich -- for two items, the ternary construct is simple, efficient (and to me; clear). Perfect for the task at hand.
In reply to Re: Ternary vs. Sort vs. Max
by BrowserUk
in thread Ternary vs. Sort vs. Max
by QM
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |