the requirement for XML is to die on errors. No guessing, don't be polite about it, just up and die.
I'm no big fan of XML, but I think this is the biggest strength of XML and related tools. Either your XML is well-formed, or your tools start to complain. Tools that generate tag soup instead of XML and name it XML are just broken and need to be fixed or must stop calling their output XML.
Alexander
In reply to Re^3: Reading a particular xml
by afoken
in thread Reading a particular xml
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |