Hello, AnomalousMonk. Thank you for pointing that out. So, is it safe for me to assume that each object attribute should both have a setter and a getter method? If I understood correctly, there has to be a way to update or access an object attribute.
In reply to Re^4: OOP's setter/getter method - is there a way to avoid them?
by tiny_monk
in thread OOP's setter/getter method - is there a way to avoid them?
by tiny_monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |