pp will try to generate multiple executables and will fail.
I'm sure that it will not do that :)
I was under the impression that the '-f'-option will decrypt ALL scripts automatically.
You mean encrypt. Why should -f option encrypt something that is not considered a script and ends up in inc/lib instead of inc/scripts?
OTOH, the -F option probably ought to encrypt any .pl files that end up in inc/lib -- you probably found a bug
All additional pl-files (foo1.pl and foo2.pl) are subroutines from other applications. That's why there are separate files.
Smart! Writing perl like its 1994 :)
In reply to Re^4: Included scripts did not encrypt using pp (libs aren't scripts)
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Included scripts did not encrypt using pp
by jowe
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |