But being strictly picky (for this size of operation at least), isn't it cheaper (disk/cpu wise) to do my own small recursion?Uh, File::Find is a particularly well-written piece of code, and has optimizations to ensure that it do unnecessary stat'ing (an optimization that made File::Find actually beat /usr/bin/find on Sunos 4.1.3 on an NFS-mounted directory.
Also, File::Find means your program won't chase symlinks incorrectly (did you think of those?) and your program will be portable to non-Unix platforms trivially.
So, don't reinvent your own directory recursing code. Use File::Find.
In reply to RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Its not supposed to!
by merlyn
in thread Its not supposed to!
by BBQ
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |