XML::Simple would probably be better named 'XML::Basic' or 'XML::Tiny'. Perhaps even 'Acme::TinyXML' would be a better name. With the right options it does read quite a bit of valid XML into reasonable data structures and will write valid XML from data structures. It's a serializer/deserializer for XML, not really a full-blown XML tool.
I've never used for configuration files for my own work, but I can see where it could be handy if people really like XML. I have used it in a configuration front-end to things that require their configuration files in XML and expect someone to hand-tweak that. In fact, I once had an ActionScript web app I had to deploy for a client that depended on a specific ordering of XML nodes. It was simple enough to change the ActionScript not to care about ordering, so I did that. Then I used XML::Simple in a pretty straightforward way to generate from an interactive program what my client would never have been expected to maintain by hand.
As for YAML, the more quirks I see with that the less I despise XML for configuration. I tend to use JSON, and if the target audience is nontechnical enough not to grok JSON then they probably want a configuration front-end rather than tweaking the configuration file by hand anyway. In my current work, the JSON configuration file is often generated from other data by a configuration management system.
If someone's trying to handle arbitrary XML with XML::Simple, then that's going to be painful for them. There are warnings specifically about that in the module's documentation.
In reply to Re: XML::Simple needs to go!
by mr_mischief
in thread XML::Simple needs to go!
by Preceptor
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |