Instead of using words like "pollute" and stirring an inquisition/witch hunt climate what about demonstrating your contributions to Perl5 and showing alternatives to development in a positive way?
It's my personal believe that Perl6 should have been better named Perl++ from the beginning and that this resulted in a marketing disaster. ²
But I'd really prefer to see positive contributions to Perl5 by the critics, instead of spilling hatred against the P6 folks.
Nota Bene: it took Perl5 over 15 years to add function signatures to core and it's still experimental.
Now how is this a convincing position to damage other contributions?
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!
²) well, easy to say in hindsight... but I'm repeating this since 2008 ( update and since it's Larry's decision I have to accept it. It's his language!)
In reply to Re^3: Basic Times Table excercise (Witch Hunt)
by LanX
in thread Basic Times Table excercise
by jibberjabber
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |