While I don’t find this kind of benchmark too exciting I will add that the difference is greater on OS X; well over a hundred times faster for 5. It’s easy, for me anyway, to forget how well tuned 5 is…

# This is perl 5, version 18, subversion 2 (v5.18.2) built for darwin- +2level moo@cow[22]~>time perl -E 'my $s; for ( 1..1_000_000 ) { $s+=1/$_**2 } +; say $s' 1.64493306684877 0.111u 0.000s 0:00.11 100.0% 0+0k 0+2io 0pf+0w # Both the last two Rakudo builds of 6.c produced same results moo@cow[30]~>time perl6 -e 'my $s; for ( 1..1_000_000 ) { $s+=1/$_**2 +}; say $s' 1.64493306684877 16.198u 0.300s 0:16.55 99.6% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w

In reply to Re^3: Perl 6 and performance by Your Mother
in thread Perl 6 and performance by kikuchiyo

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.