I am sure RPerl is a significant improvement. My understanding / guess is that it works for almost all production use perl scripts - bad luck for a few esoteric ones. My questions: Why is there no buzz about this solution? Is it too good to be true? Is the RPerl development team not sufficiently large? Are there any factors preventing the widespread adoption of this differently conceptualised solution? Any attitude / "religious" / not-done-like-this-here biases? Or, it is not worthwhile to implement & too much of a hassle to explain why? RPerl seems to a better tool. Why is the world not beating a road to Will the Chill's door?

In reply to Re^2: Perl compiler request - flogging the dead horse! by Sanjay
in thread Perl compiler request - flogging the dead horse! by Sanjay

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.