Sure, and if you understand the "I smell a bug" to be referring to the OP, then Re: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug? never claims that there is a bug in its code :-) It just reproduces an output "kinda sorta" like in the OP, except that it is (undef, 0.002) instead of the OP's (0.002, undef)
In reply to Re^5: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread List::MoreUtils' minmax bug?
by perlancar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |