First, a couple of things: Always use warnings;. Avoid using $_[0] etc. directly unless you know why you need to, instead do sub foo { my ($x,$y,$z) = @_; ... }. Don't turn off strict for the whole module, just do it in as small a scope as possible. (And in fact, in this case, you don't even need to turn it off at all, since you're not accessing subroutines via their name, you're accessing them via a code reference, e.g. \&get_locations.)
In general, you probably should study perlreftut and perlref. The way to call a code reference is $coderef->($arg1, $arg2, ...), where $coderef can also be a complex dereference consisting of hashes, arrays, and calls to other code references.
# ---8<--- ProcessData.pm ---8<--- package ProcessData; use warnings; use strict; use Carp; sub new { my ($class) = @_; my $self = { _dispatch_table => {} }; return bless $self, $class; } sub add_subroutine { @_==3 or croak "Insufficient arguments passed to add_subroutine(). +"; my ($self,$name,$code) = @_; croak "The reference passed to add_subroutine() is not a CODE refe +rence." unless ref $code eq "CODE"; $self->{_dispatch_table}{$name} = $code; } sub process_data { @_==2 or croak "Insufficient arguments passed to process_data()."; my ($self,$name) = @_; $self->{_dispatch_table}{$name}->(); } sub process_locations { my ($self) = @_; $self->process_data("locations"); } 1; # ---8<--- test.pl ---8<--- use warnings; use strict; use ProcessData; my $pd = ProcessData->new(); $pd->add_subroutine("locations", \&get_locations); $pd->process_locations; sub get_locations { print "get_locations...\n" }
In reply to Re: Is it possible to call a package::main subroutine from a module?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Is it possible to call a package::main subroutine from a module?
by TorontoJim
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |