Update: While the  (?: (b.) (?{ push @two, $2 }))+ approach discussed in this reply can certainly work, I think I would prefer the two-step approach outlined in choroba's reply above for its greater readability and maintainability.

If I take the for-loop out of the equation, I get something closer to what I expect (still Strawberry 5.14.4.1):

c:\@Work\Perl\monks>perl -wMstrict -le "my $string = 'ab1b2b3b4d'; my @two; my @matches = $string =~ /(a) (b.(?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; ;; $string = 'ab5b6b7d'; @two = (); @matches = $string =~ /(a) (b.(?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; ;; $string = 'ab8b9d'; @two = (); @matches = $string =~ /(a) (b.(?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; ;; $string = 'abxd'; @two = (); @matches = $string =~ /(a) (b.(?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; ;; $string = 'ad'; @two = (); @matches = $string =~ /(a) (b.(?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; " 'ab1b2b3b4d' -> all:(a b4 d) -> 2:(b1 b2 b3) 'ab5b6b7d' -> all:(a b7 d) -> 2:(b5 b6) 'ab8b9d' -> all:(a b9 d) -> 2:(b8) 'abxd' -> all:(a bx d) -> 2:() 'ad' -> all:() -> 2:()
And if I re-arrange the capturing, I get exactly what I expect:
c:\@Work\Perl\monks>perl -wMstrict -le "my $string = 'ab1b2b3b4d'; my @two; my @matches = $string =~ /(a) (?: (b.) (?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }) +)+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; ;; $string = 'ab5b6b7d'; @two = (); @matches = $string =~ /(a) (?: (b.) (?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; ;; $string = 'ab8b9d'; @two = (); @matches = $string =~ /(a) (?: (b.) (?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; ;; $string = 'abxd'; @two = (); @matches = $string =~ /(a) (?: (b.) (?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; ;; $string = 'ad'; @two = (); @matches = $string =~ /(a) (?: (b.) (?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+ (d)/x; print qq{'$string' -> all:(@matches) -> 2:(@two)}; " 'ab1b2b3b4d' -> all:(a b4 d) -> 2:(b1 b2 b3 b4) 'ab5b6b7d' -> all:(a b7 d) -> 2:(b5 b6 b7) 'ab8b9d' -> all:(a b9 d) -> 2:(b8 b9) 'abxd' -> all:(a bx d) -> 2:(bx) 'ad' -> all:() -> 2:()

Update: The expression
    (?: (b.) (?{ push @two, $2 if defined $2 }))+
works just as well without the statement modifier:
    (?: (b.) (?{ push @two, $2 }))+
I don't understand the use of the statement modifier: Could  $2 ever be undefined in this situation?


Give a man a fish:  <%-{-{-{-<


In reply to Re^6: Regex troubles... by AnomalousMonk
in thread Regex troubles... by kepler

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.