1. Post harmless content which looks like spam at first glance to provoke reaping.
2. Start a discussion that content was "destroyed" and keep the guards busy discussing if an anonymous monk who dissappeared was probably mistreated.
The perfect self regulatory system doesn't exist, we can't employ editors who do a background check for every post.
It's like shooting someone who attacks you with a water pistol. It's still self defence if the gun looks real.
Probably I also voted reap, because I trusted OGB and this looked weird.
Restoring or not won't really change much now.
I'd just suggest to stop feeding this discussion.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!
In reply to Re^10: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node
by LanX
in thread unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node
by beech
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |