Perl documentation is typically skimpy when it comes to formal specifications. Handwaving and C terminology is used ("undefined behavior") where such parallels can be drawn. I suppose it is prudent to make no promises one might renege later.
So this is certainly news to me. I thought one couldn't really depend on their order of evaluation. If there was such a strong guarantee, I'd have expected the docs to be clear on this. A note in perlsub, perlop or perlfunc; heck, why not all three.
"Subroutine arguments are evaluated from left to right."
Considering that you speak with something of an authority, would it be too much to ask of you to please update the perl documentation with the relevant detail? A prominent, unequivocal, unambiguous notice to this effect would be lovely to have.
In reply to Re^4: Evaluation Order again.
by oiskuu
in thread Evaluation Order again.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |