Now you're splitting hairs. "Arguments to subroutines are evaluated in list order: from left to right." Is that better?
Remember, documentation is not written for a person who already knows everything. (I need the clarity to stop imagining unwarranted parallels.)
Update. ikegami: human language affords its speakers some latitude. In this case, "arguments" can refer to elements on stack (a technical view); it can refer to tokens of source code (parsing context); or it can refer to the expressions that end up as arguments. All three interpretations (and possibly more) are used in perl documentation. How would you describe f($a, $b, $c)? A function supplied with three expressions?
In reply to Re^6: Evaluation Order again.
by oiskuu
in thread Evaluation Order again.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |