These two modes are very similar and do basically the same.
Their usefulness heavily depends on the configured provider back-ends (so called "omni-completion" )... and from what I see both don't bring notable Perl support out of the box.
At least plsense builds on auto-complete to provide Perl omni-completion.
But if you have details on why to prefer the one over the other, I'd be interested to hear them.
> I prefer flycheck to flymake,
IMHO fly-make is build in, that's why I use it. The intention of my talk is to give an overview, people are free to experiment and contribute better solutions.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!
In reply to Re^2: [EMACS] "Emacs as Perl IDE" - Abstract for YAPC::EU 2016
by LanX
in thread [EMACS] "Emacs as Perl IDE" - Abstract for YAPC::EU 2016
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |