Those modules are not using camel case for methods at all. For package names there was no question from my side.
:) Well, they weren't given as an example of using camel case for methods :D
In reply to Re^7: CamelCase really that bad?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread CamelCase really that bad?
by gzartman
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |