Well, mine doesn't, for sure. Transcript:
qwurx [shmem] ~> perl -le 'print "line $_" for 1..15' >| linenumber.tx +t qwurx [shmem] ~> sed -ne '10,15p;5p' linenumber.txt line 5 line 10 line 11 line 12 line 13 line 14 line 15 qwurx [shmem] ~> which sed /bin/sed qwurx [shmem] ~> dpkg -S `which sed` sed: /bin/sed qwurx [shmem] ~> dpkg -l sed Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/T +rig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-===============-============-============-======================== +============ ii sed 4.2.2-4+b1 amd64 The GNU sed stream edito +r
Show evidence of yours.
In defence of my oh-so-cool perl snippet -
And that's pretty much all about that. If I were better at typing, two of them three arguments would be quite pointless ;-)
In reply to Re^4: extract (a range of) numbered lines from a file
by shmem
in thread extract (a range of) numbered lines from a file
by shmem
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |