Hi perldigious,
To answer the other part of your question: If you wanted to propose a new warning, you'd do so to the Perl 5 Porters, perhaps as a new "wishlist" priority bug report. However, from being a lurker on P5P for quite some time, I don't think a new warning would be added without there being a lot of usefulness to it, and the warning, its implications, implementation etc. need to be well thought-out. Also, a lot of things can be done outside core Perl, for example, obvious re-uses of a filehandle, at least in the same lexical scope, could be detected with a Perl::Critic policy, perhaps based on a modified Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::RequireBriefOpen. Of course, another way to prevent your bug would be to be more careful with the lexical scoping of filehandle variables ;-)
Hope this helps,
-- Hauke D
In reply to Re: Propose addition to use warnings?
by haukex
in thread Propose addition to use warnings?
by perldigious
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |