Seems to me that when a new route is added, the default should be that path_info exactly match the route. Otherwise, either supply the route as a regex, or supply an optional parameter which is a regex for matching acceptable additional path_info content. If either the route regex or the additional regex failed to match, then the try the next route.
Either way, path_info would be validated before it was available to any handler.
In reply to Re: Cool uses for path_info
by RonW
in thread Cool uses for path_info
by Dallaylaen
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |