I'm having some trouble understanding what it is you are trying to accomplish here. If you are looking to install mod_perl2 (I think it's safe enough to just call it mod_perl these days) on an O/S via a packager then why not just use the mod_perl package provided by the distributor? mod_perl is available in RPM for CentOS 6 and 7 and various Fedora releases. I would be very surprised if it were not also available as a DEB for Ubuntu. By using the distributor's versions you know that the various components (apache, perl, libapreq2, etc.) will all play nicely together.
If your question is more general than just mod_perl, perhaps you could explain in a bit more detail what you are trying to do and where precisely the problem lies. At the moment it sounds more like a packaging problem than a perl problem.
In reply to Re: adding modules from CPAN to "packaged" mod_perl2
by hippo
in thread adding modules from CPAN to "packaged" mod_perl2
by glasswalk3r
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |