Note the (likely) unexpected behavior seen for:use strict; use warnings; my $var_name_modifier1 = '100'; my $var_name_modifier2 = '200'; our $specific_200_var = "this is from 200\n\n"; our $specific_100_var = "this is from 100\n\n"; print "\n\n\n\n"; print 'this is what we have for 100: '; NO_STRICT_BLOCK: { no strict "refs"; print ${"specific_${var_name_modifier1}_var"}; } print " \n\n";
use strict; use warnings; our $value = "Valuable information"; print 'this is what we have: '; NO_STRICT_BLOCK: { my $value = 'Ha ha, I changed it!'; no strict "refs"; print ${"value"}; }
#11929 First ask yourself `How would I do this without a computer?' Then have the computer do it the same way.
In reply to Re: Contain yourselves please: THEORETICAL question about variable values being used as A PART of another variable's name.
by kennethk
in thread Contain yourselves please: THEORETICAL question about variable values being used as A PART of another variable's name.
by MarsRover
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |