I though that post-fix-for doesn't have an own scope, analogous to post-fix-if
So I ran a test and it turned out that post-fix-for is neither fish nor flesh, it's pretending and denying having an own scope ... ugh ...oO
please notice how the redeclaration of $x is reported but the value gets lost.
Looks like a bug...
use strict; use warnings; my $y=666 if 1; warn $y; my $x=1; my $x=42 for 1; warn $x;
"my" variable $x masks earlier declaration in same scope at c:/tmp/pm/ +scope_postfix_for.pl line 12. 666 at c:/tmp/pm/scope_postfix_for.pl line 7. Use of uninitialized value $x in warn at c:/tmp/pm/scope_postfix_for.p +l line 16. Warning: something's wrong at c:/tmp/pm/scope_postfix_for.pl line 16.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!
In reply to Re^4: Feature Idea: qr//e
by LanX
in thread Feature Idea: qr//e (updated with solutions)
by haukex
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |